By Brigitta Warren · Updated September 2026
Why exit interviews are worth doing properly
Most exit interviews are a form filled in by HR on the last day, filed and never read. That is a waste of a rare opportunity. Someone who has already resigned has no reason to soften the truth about pay, management, workload or culture, and they know things about the business that nobody in the leadership team hears.
Done well, exit interviews tell you why people really leave (which is often not the reason given in the resignation letter), which managers are losing people, where pay has drifted below market, and what competitors are offering. Over a year, patterns emerge. Those patterns are the basis for real retention strategies, and they let you put a number on what turnover is costing. Our employee turnover cost guide shows how.
How to run one that gets honest answers
- Who asks matters. Not the person's direct manager. Ideally someone one step removed, such as the owner, a senior leader from another area, or an external person. Many of our clients ask us to run exit interviews for senior departures for exactly this reason.
- Timing. Not the last afternoon. A few days before the end, when the person has mentally moved on enough to be candid but is still present.
- Format. A conversation, 30 to 45 minutes, in private. A survey can supplement but not replace it.
- Set the frame. Explain that the purpose is to improve the business for the people who stay, that nothing said will affect their reference, and how the information will be used and by whom.
- Listen more than you talk. Do not defend the business or the manager. Ask follow-up questions. Take notes.
- Be consistent. Ask the same core questions of everyone so answers can be compared over time.
The 20 questions
The decision to leave
- What first prompted you to start looking, and when was that?
- What was the deciding factor in accepting the new role?
- Was there anything we could have done that would have changed your decision?
- Did you raise your concerns with anyone here before you resigned? What happened?
- How does the new role compare on pay, title, flexibility and progression?
The role itself
- Did the job match what you were told when you were hired? Where did it differ?
- Did you have the tools, resources and authority to do the job well?
- What part of the role did you find most frustrating or least valuable?
- What would you change about how the role is set up for the next person?
Management and leadership
- How would you describe the support you received from your manager?
- Did you get regular, useful feedback on your performance?
- Did you feel your ideas and concerns were heard by leadership?
- What should your manager keep doing, and what should they do differently?
Culture, pay and development
- How would you describe the culture here to a friend thinking of applying?
- Did you feel fairly paid for the work you did, compared with the market?
- What development or progression did you hope for, and did you get it?
- Was there anything about workload, hours or flexibility that made staying harder?
Looking forward
- What is the one thing you would fix first if you were running this business?
- Would you consider returning in future, and under what circumstances?
- Is there anything you have not been asked that you think we should know?
What good follow-up questions sound like
The first answer is rarely the real one. "I got a better opportunity" is a headline; the story is underneath. Useful probes:
- "Can you give me an example of that?"
- "When did you first notice it?"
- "Who else do you think feels the same way?"
- "If that had been different, would you still be leaving?"
- "What would a good version of that have looked like?"
And one to avoid: "Is it because of [name]?" Leading questions produce the answer you were looking for rather than the truth.
What to do with the answers
Information without action is just a sad file. A simple system:
- Write it up within 24 hours while the conversation is fresh. Separate facts, opinions and quotes.
- Tag the primary and secondary reasons using a fixed set: pay, progression, manager, workload, flexibility, role mismatch, culture, personal, relocation. Consistency lets you count.
- Share what is actionable with the right person. Pay drift goes to whoever owns salary reviews. A management issue goes to the manager's manager, handled carefully and with the departing person's permission where names are involved.
- Review quarterly. Three departures citing the same manager, or the same pay gap, is not three separate problems.
- Close the loop. When something changes because of exit feedback, tell the remaining team. It shows the process has teeth.
Confidentiality has limits. If someone raises a safety issue, bullying or unlawful behaviour, you have an obligation to act on it regardless of the setting.
A one-page write-up template
Keep the record short and consistent so it can be compared across departures. One page, six headings:
| Heading | What to record |
|---|---|
| Role and tenure | Position, manager, start and end dates, destination if known (competitor, different industry, promotion, relocation) |
| Primary reason | One tag from the fixed list: pay, progression, manager, workload, flexibility, role mismatch, culture, personal, relocation |
| Secondary reasons | Up to two more tags, in order of weight |
| What they said | Three to five direct quotes that capture it. Quotes carry more weight with leadership than summaries |
| Could we have kept them? | Yes, no or maybe, with what it would have taken |
| Actions | Who needs to know what, and by when |
Store the write-ups together and review them as a set each quarter. After four or five, the patterns are usually obvious, and often not the ones the leadership team expected. It is common for a business to assume departures are about pay and find, once the write-ups are side by side, that pay is the primary reason for a minority and the same manager or the same lack of progression accounts for most of the rest.
Exit interviews after redundancy or restructure
When someone leaves because their role was disestablished rather than by choice, the conversation is different but still valuable. Ask about the process: was it fair, was communication clear, did they feel treated with respect? Ask about the business: what would they have changed? People made redundant often have unusually clear views about what the business is getting wrong, and asking shows you still value their judgement.
Where we provide outplacement support after a restructure, we also feed back themes to the employer, anonymised, because the people leaving frequently tell us things the leadership team needs to hear. See our guides to the redundancy process and restructuring process for the wider picture.
A shorter alternative: the stay interview
The best exit interview is the one you never need because you asked the questions a year earlier. A "stay interview" is the same conversation with someone who has not resigned: what keeps you here, what would make you leave, what frustrates you, what do you want next? Held annually with your key people, separate from the performance review, it surfaces the same issues while there is still time to fix them.
If your business is losing people it cannot afford to lose and the exit interviews are not telling you why, we are happy to run them independently and give you an honest read. Talk to us.
