By Brigitta Warren · Updated September 2026
Before the questions: set up the interview properly
The best questions in the world do not help if every candidate gets a different interview. Three rules:
- Decide what you are assessing. Pick five or six capabilities from the job description, such as leading managers, driving improvement, commercial judgement, managing performance, leading change. Choose questions that test those.
- Ask every candidate the same core questions. Structured interviews are more predictive than free-flowing ones, and far more defensible.
- Ask for real examples, then dig. "Tell me about a time" is the opening. The evidence is in the follow-ups: what exactly did you do, what happened, what would you do differently? A candidate who can only speak in generalities has probably not done it.
Twenty-five questions is a menu, not a script. A 60 to 75 minute interview covers eight to twelve of them properly.
Leadership and judgement
- Describe the team you are leading now. How did you shape it? Good answers describe deliberate decisions: who they hired, who they moved, who they let go, and why. Weak answers describe an inherited team with no changes.
- Tell me about a decision you got wrong. What did you do about it? You are listening for ownership and correction, not a disguised strength. "I trusted someone too long" with a clear account of what happened next is a good sign.
- How do you decide what to delegate and what to keep? Strong managers have a rule of thumb and examples of stretching people through delegation. Those who "prefer to do it myself to be sure" will become a bottleneck.
- What is the hardest conversation you have had with a direct report in the last year? Look for directness, preparation and follow-through. If they cannot think of one, they are avoiding them.
- How do you build trust with a team that did not choose you? Relevant to every external hire. Good answers involve listening first, visible early wins and consistency.
- What do your team say about you when you are not in the room? Self-awareness. Answers that include a genuine weakness are more credible than flawless ones.
Operations and results
- Walk me through the numbers you look at every week, and what you do when one moves. Managers who run on data can list them without hesitating and describe a real response. Vague answers here are a serious concern for an operations role.
- Tell me about a measurable improvement you led. What was the number before and after? Specific figures, a credible method, and honesty about what they personally did versus what the team did.
- Describe a time you had to deliver with fewer resources than you needed. Prioritisation and creativity, and the willingness to push back when the ask was genuinely unrealistic.
- How have you managed a budget? What did you cut, and what did you protect? Commercial judgement. Listen for an understanding of what drives value, not just cost-cutting.
- What system or process did you build that outlasted you? Good managers leave things behind. It is a useful test of whether they build capability or depend on personal heroics.
- Tell me about a safety, quality or compliance issue you dealt with. Essential for manufacturing and engineering roles. Look for taking it seriously, acting promptly and fixing the root cause.
- How do you decide when a problem needs you and when it does not? Separates managers who escalate everything, or nothing, from those who have a working sense of proportion.
People and performance
- How do you run one-on-ones, and how often? If they do not run them, or "when needed", that is the answer. Good managers have a rhythm and a structure.
- Tell me about someone you developed who went on to a bigger role. Pride in other people's growth is one of the clearest markers of a genuine leader.
- Describe a time you managed someone out. How did you handle it? Fairness, process, and the ability to make the decision. In New Zealand, also listen for awareness of what a fair process requires.
- How do you handle a high performer who is difficult to work with? There is no perfect answer, but there is a wrong one: ignoring it because of the results.
- How have you dealt with conflict between two people in your team? Early, direct, and with a view to the relationship continuing.
- What do you do when you disagree with a decision from above? Argue in private, support in public, and know when to escalate. Managers who undermine upwards will do it to you too.
- How do you give feedback that someone does not want to hear? Specific, timely, private, and followed up. Ask for an example.
Change and the future
- Describe a significant change you led. What resistance did you meet and what did you do about it? Look for an understanding of why people resist, and patience combined with persistence.
- Tell me about a time a change you led did not work. Again, ownership and learning. Everyone who has led change has one of these.
- What have you changed your mind about professionally in the last few years? Intellectual honesty and curiosity. People who have not changed their mind about anything have stopped learning.
- What would you want to know about this business before accepting the role? Strong candidates have researched you and ask about the things that will decide whether they succeed: the team, the numbers, the owner's expectations. No questions is a bad sign.
- Six months in, how would you and I know it was going well? Tests whether they think in outcomes. It also tells you what they expect from you, which is useful data.
A simple scoring approach
Score each capability, not each question, on a four-point scale immediately after the interview and before discussing with other interviewers:
| Score | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 1 | No credible evidence, or evidence of the opposite |
| 2 | Some evidence, but thin, generic or at a lower level than the role needs |
| 3 | Clear, specific evidence at the level required |
| 4 | Strong, repeated evidence with measurable results and self-awareness |
Write a sentence of evidence next to each score. Then compare notes. Where interviewers disagree by two points or more, talk it through; the disagreement usually reveals something useful about either the candidate or the brief. Do not average scores across interviewers without discussion, and do not let a strong performance on one capability paper over a 1 on something essential.
What the questions will not tell you
Interviews are one input. Even a well-structured one is a performance, and some excellent managers are poor interviewees. Balance it with:
- Reference checks with people who reported to them, not only their former bosses. Ask the referees the same questions.
- A practical exercise for senior roles: a real problem from your business, an hour to prepare, a discussion. How they think is more revealing than what they say about how they think.
- Time with the team. A site walk or an informal session tells you how they engage with people at every level.
When we run a search we interview every shortlisted candidate against the capabilities in the brief, reference them properly and give you a written summary of the evidence, so your own interviews can go deeper. See how we approach executive recruitment and permanent recruitment, or read about why getting the brief right first matters so much in why taking a brief is the shortcut to a mis-hire.
